Days of Our Lives fans are no strangers to intrigue, but a recent interview with Greg Rikaart has sent shockwaves through the fandom, igniting fierce speculation

that the actor may have unintentionally spoiled the long-term fate of one of Salem’s most volatile pairings: Leo Stark and Dimitri von Leuschner.

What was meant to be a thoughtful reflection on Leo’s emotional journey has instead become a flashpoint for debate, with viewers convinced that Rikaart let slip

a crucial clue about where this tangled love triangle is ultimately heading.

At the heart of the conversation is Leo Stark—a character defined by contradictions, flamboyance, insecurity, ambition, and an almost magnetic pull toward chaos. Over the past year, Leo’s storyline has attempted something deceptively simple yet emotionally complex: redemption. His relationship with Javi appeared to offer stability, growth, and a chance at a healthier future. But as every Days fan knows, Salem rarely allows happiness to go uninterrupted.

A Fragile Redemption Shattered by Loss

Leo’s carefully balanced world recently imploded when Javi made the heartbreaking decision to leave Salem to care for his ailing father. On the surface, it was a noble and understandable exit, but as Rikaart himself explained, the emotional consequences for Leo run far deeper than a standard soap breakup.

According to the actor, Javi’s departure wasn’t merely the loss of a partner—it was the loss of Leo’s anchor. Javi represented structure, accountability, and a moral compass that helped keep Leo’s worst impulses in check. Without him, Leo is left untethered, forced to confront his own instability and the lingering question of whether his so-called transformation was ever truly secure.

Rikaart described Leo’s progress as fragile rather than permanent, emphasizing that growth doesn’t follow a straight line. This insight resonated deeply with viewers, many of whom have long argued that Leo’s redemption arc felt more like a temporary truce with his darker instincts than a lasting change.

Dimitri’s Return: A Catalyst for Chaos

Complicating matters further is the reemergence of Dimitri von Leuschner—a character whose chemistry with Leo is undeniable and whose presence represents temptation, danger, and unresolved history. Leo believed he had moved past Dimitri, convincing himself that chapter of his life was closed. But Dimitri’s return shattered that illusion almost instantly.

Rikaart noted that Leo’s confidence in his emotional growth crumbled the moment Dimitri re-entered the picture. The feelings Leo thought he had conquered resurfaced with unsettling intensity, exposing just how precarious his sense of self really was. It’s not simply about attraction—it’s about identity. Dimitri reflects the version of Leo that thrives on risk, manipulation, and emotional extremes.

This is where fans began to sense something more than character analysis. The way Rikaart spoke about Leo’s reaction felt less like hindsight and more like foreshadowing—hinting that Dimitri’s return isn’t just a test, but a turning point with irreversible consequences.

The Comment That Sparked a Firestorm

The interview took a dramatic turn when Rikaart, while discussing Leo’s emotional confusion, made a remark that instantly set alarm bells ringing. In reflecting on Leo’s connection to Dimitri, the actor alluded to “inevitable consequences of what they’ve already put in motion,” before quickly correcting himself and pivoting to safer territory.

For many fans, that fleeting phrase changed everything.’

The wording suggested action rather than emotion—plans rather than feelings. Viewers immediately questioned what, exactly, has already been “put in motion.” Was Rikaart merely speaking metaphorically, or did he inadvertently confirm that Leo and Dimitri have already crossed a line offscreen? A secret scheme? A hidden alliance? Or perhaps a decision that will soon explode into the open?

The speed and awkwardness of the correction only fueled speculation. To longtime Days watchers, it felt like a classic soap spoiler moment—one that slipped out before it was meant to.

A Love Triangle—or Something More Sinister?

When pressed about Leo’s future, Rikaart was asked to choose which relationship he personally preferred: the stability Javi offered, the electric toxicity of Dimitri, or Leo’s chaotic bond with Gwen. His answer was telling. Rather than selecting a path, he described the dilemma as a “Sophie’s Choice,” implying that any decision would come at a devastating cost.

On the surface, this could be read as an actor diplomatically avoiding shipper wars. But in context, the phrase carried heavier implications. A Sophie’s Choice isn’t just difficult—it’s tragic, involving irreversible loss no matter the outcome. To many fans, this suggested that the choice may already be made, or at least that the fallout will be catastrophic.

The idea that Leo might attempt to maintain multiple worlds at once—keeping Javi as emotional security while secretly aligning with Dimitri—feels entirely in character. Leo has always wanted everything: love, validation, power, and excitement. And history shows that when forced to choose between safety and sparkle, he almost always chooses the latter.

The Inevitability of Relapse

One of the most striking aspects of Rikaart’s interview was his candid discussion of relapse. He openly acknowledged that for Leo, the temptation to return to old habits is never fully gone. Rather than framing this as a failure, he described it as an intrinsic part of the character—a deeply ingrained instinct that can be managed but never erased.

This perspective reframes the entire storyline. Leo’s “good behavior” era was never meant to last forever; it was always a ticking clock. With Javi gone, that clock has run out. Dimitri doesn’t just represent temptation—he represents home turf for Leo’s chaos-loving psyche.

Rikaart’s comments suggest that Leo finds a twisted sense of comfort in disorder. Even pain can feel preferable to stability if it validates his ego and confirms that his feelings were “real.” In that sense, Dimitri wanting him—even for selfish or destructive reasons—offers a dangerous kind of reassurance.

What Comes Next for Leo and Dimitri?

Taken together, Rikaart’s remarks paint a picture of a storyline heading toward high-stakes drama rather than romantic resolution. Fans are now theorizing that Leo and Dimitri may soon be revealed as co-conspirators in a major scheme, possibly involving the von Leuschner fortune or another Salem-shaking plot. Their chemistry, after all, has always thrived more in manipulation than in tenderness.

There’s also the looming possibility of collateral damage. Gwen, in particular, could find herself betrayed if Leo chooses ambition and passion over loyalty. Such a move would mark the definitive end of “good Leo” and cement his return as one of Salem’s most captivating antiheroes.

A Long Game with Devastating Payoff

Rikaart emphasized his trust in playing the long game—allowing Leo’s story to remain unresolved, messy, and emotionally raw. He spoke of resilience not as healing, but as survival: Leo’s ability to endure the consequences of his own self-destructive choices.

And that may be the biggest clue of all. This storyline isn’t about Leo finding peace. It’s about Leo knowingly stepping back into the fire, fully aware of what he stands to lose.

Whether Greg Rikaart truly spoiled an upcoming twist or simply misspoke, one thing is clear: Leo Stark’s journey is far from over, and the path ahead promises betrayal, passion, and classic Days of Our Lives drama at its finest. As the sands in the hourglass continue to fall, Salem—and the audience—waits for the moment when everything that’s been “put in motion” finally explodes.